Two days ago, I was chatting with my friends about my current work. My friend said that this model seems to be operation-oriented, and the Whatsapp Database products are difficult to develop. So I asked my friends to say, in addition to social networking and tools, to name a few products that are currently drive mode. Later, I expanded on this topic, and I don’t know how to bring up the topic of product models. Many people (including myself) have a Whatsapp Database very shallow understanding of products, and even stay at the level of making a web page or an app.
The first time I heard the word product model was in an article in Sterling Silver, and the definition he gave at the time was:In the product definition given by Mr. Yu Jun, a product is a position that integrates demand, production and sales; on Whatsapp Database the surface, these two definitions seem to have nothing to do with each other, but if you think about it carefully, they are actually the same thing. From the perspective of the responsibility of the Whatsapp Database product, the product first needs to determine whether a thing should be done or not, and whether it is worth doing.
From a small function point to a new product, all these things need to be considered. The product model I understand = business model + technical architecture + product architecture + operation system (the courage to add something on Whatsapp Database the basis of the sterling silver formula). The rank of the product model is relatively high, and it is not accessible to ordinary people; here, I try to talk about some of my own YY, after all, I have never actually Whatsapp Database traded it, so I will keep it for future review. I personally believe that the product model determines the upper limit and fate of the product.